|
|
Post by Spottedpaw on Jul 17, 2009 14:57:07 GMT -5
Okay so I need to do a poll for the type of rp that we are going to do for the upcoming prophecy.
Type number 1:
"What were you doing?" he demanded, leaning in close to her face. "Under whose orders were you acting?'
Type Number 2:
What were you doing?*Leaned in close to her face.* Under whose orders were you acting?
I'm not going to vote at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tallpoppy on Jul 17, 2009 15:06:13 GMT -5
I'm One all the way! It reminds of the good old times....
|
|
|
|
Post by Spottedpaw on Jul 17, 2009 15:07:45 GMT -5
I know same.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Spottedpaw on Jul 17, 2009 15:08:04 GMT -5
I think people have gotten lazy over the years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tallpoppy on Jul 17, 2009 15:13:56 GMT -5
Agreed. I know someone who would murder us, by how lazy we are. I mean, no joke, she write over 200 words per post.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spottedpaw on Jul 17, 2009 15:17:46 GMT -5
Awesome:) Better practice then too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tallpoppy on Jul 17, 2009 15:20:39 GMT -5
yeah, she wouldn't let us post least than five sentences. And if the other person's reply is long, then yours has to be at least ten.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spottedpaw on Jul 17, 2009 15:34:58 GMT -5
Wow...I like it. But I can't have that kind of limit on it though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tallpoppy on Jul 17, 2009 15:39:11 GMT -5
yeah, that's why my warn level was 5% on one site
|
|
|
|
Post by Goldenstar on Jul 17, 2009 15:51:42 GMT -5
Wow. Vote please people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Silverfrost on Jul 17, 2009 15:54:56 GMT -5
i like type2. it's easier
|
|
|
|
Post by Tallpoppy on Jul 17, 2009 16:07:27 GMT -5
I say 1, since I've down it for years and well, I just like it more
|
|
|
|
Post by Spottedpaw on Jul 17, 2009 17:41:01 GMT -5
I did one for a couple years then I quit rping and now I started again 2 was all I could find.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leaffeather on Jul 17, 2009 19:01:21 GMT -5
I switch back & forth, but I usualy go with #1. On this one site I play on you can only do #1, I love it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Goldenstar on Jul 17, 2009 19:15:28 GMT -5
 Good. |
|
